Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
MacQueen, A (Ed.)Abstract We present an SNP-based crossover map for Drosophila mauritiana. Using females derived by crossing 2 different strains of D. mauritiana, we analyzed crossing over on all 5 major chromosome arms. Analysis of 105 male progeny allowed us to identify 327 crossover chromatids bearing single, double, or triple crossover events, representing 398 crossover events. We mapped the crossovers along these 5 chromosome arms using a genome sequence map that includes the euchromatin-heterochromatin boundary. Confirming previous studies, we show that the overall crossover frequency in D. mauritiana is higher than is seen in Drosophila melanogaster. Much of the increase in exchange frequency in D. mauritiana is due to a greatly diminished centromere effect. Using larval neuroblast metaphases from D. mauritiana—D. melanogaster hybrids we show that the lengths of the pericentromeric heterochromatin do not differ substantially between the species, and thus cannot explain the observed differences in crossover distribution. Using a new and robust maximum likelihood estimation tool for obtaining Weinstein tetrad distributions, we observed an increase in bivalents with 2 or more crossovers when compared with D. melanogaster. This increase in crossing over along the arms of D. mauritiana likely reflects an expansion of the crossover-available euchromatin caused by a difference in the strength of the centromere effect. The crossover pattern in D. mauritiana conflicts with the commonly accepted view of centromeres as strong polar suppressors of exchange (whose intensity is buffered by sequence nonspecific heterochromatin) and demonstrates the importance of expanding such studies into other species of Drosophila.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available March 7, 2026
-
Bosco, Giovanni (Ed.)Transposable elements (TE) are selfish genetic elements that can cause harmful mutations. In Drosophila , it has been estimated that half of all spontaneous visible marker phenotypes are mutations caused by TE insertions. Several factors likely limit the accumulation of exponentially amplifying TEs within genomes. First, synergistic interactions between TEs that amplify their harm with increasing copy number are proposed to limit TE copy number. However, the nature of this synergy is poorly understood. Second, because of the harm posed by TEs, eukaryotes have evolved systems of small RNA-based genome defense to limit transposition. However, as in all immune systems, there is a cost of autoimmunity and small RNA-based systems that silence TEs can inadvertently silence genes flanking TE insertions. In a screen for essential meiotic genes in Drosophila melanogaster , a truncated Doc retrotransposon within a neighboring gene was found to trigger the germline silencing of ald , the Drosophila Mps1 homolog, a gene essential for proper chromosome segregation in meiosis. A subsequent screen for suppressors of this silencing identified a new insertion of a Hobo DNA transposon in the same neighboring gene. Here we describe how the original Doc insertion triggers flanking piRNA biogenesis and local gene silencing. We show that this local gene silencing occurs in cis and is dependent on deadlock , a component of the Rhino-Deadlock-Cutoff (RDC) complex, to trigger dual-strand piRNA biogenesis at TE insertions. We further show how the additional Hobo insertion leads to de-silencing by reducing flanking piRNA biogenesis triggered by the original Doc insertion. These results support a model of TE-mediated gene silencing by piRNA biogenesis in cis that depends on local determinants of transcription. This may explain complex patterns of off-target gene silencing triggered by TEs within populations and in the laboratory. It also provides a mechanism of sign epistasis among TE insertions, illuminates the complex nature of their interactions and supports a model in which off-target gene silencing shapes the evolution of the RDC complex.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
